The extra test just confirms that the type-checker internally
agrees with the spec with the (otherwise invisible) type given
to an untyped constant in a specific shift expression.
For #48422.
Change-Id: I6d98045f90bd20b0cc0a96a147bec9701039cb07
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/350410
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
{`package f7b; var _ = -1e-2000i`, `-1e-2000i`, `complex128`, `(0 + 0i)`},
{`package g0; const (a = len([iota]int{}); b; c); const _ = c`, `c`, `int`, `2`}, // issue #22341
+ {`package g1; var(j int32; s int; n = 1.0<<s == j)`, `1.0`, `int32`, `1`}, // issue #48422
}
for _, test := range tests {
{`package f7b; var _ = -1e-2000i`, `-1e-2000i`, `complex128`, `(0 + 0i)`},
{`package g0; const (a = len([iota]int{}); b; c); const _ = c`, `c`, `int`, `2`}, // issue #22341
+ {`package g1; var(j int32; s int; n = 1.0<<s == j)`, `1.0`, `int32`, `1`}, // issue #48422
}
for _, test := range tests {